netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Modify sock_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 3 Aug 2021 12:44:55 +0300
From:   Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
To:     Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
        trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, anna.schumaker@...app.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Modify sock_set_keepalive() for more scenarios

On 8/3/21, Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev> wrote:
> Add 2nd parameter in sock_set_keepalive(), let the caller decide
> whether to set. This can be applied to more scenarios.

It makes sense to send the patch within a context of other scenarios

>
> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> ---
>  include/net/sock.h    |  2 +-
>  net/core/filter.c     |  4 +---
>  net/core/sock.c       | 10 ++++------
>  net/mptcp/sockopt.c   |  4 +---
>  net/rds/tcp_listen.c  |  2 +-
>  net/smc/af_smc.c      |  2 +-
>  net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c |  2 +-
>  7 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index ff1be7e7e90b..0aae26159549 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int
> optname,
>
>  void sock_enable_timestamps(struct sock *sk);
>  void sock_no_linger(struct sock *sk);
> -void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk);
> +void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk, bool valbool);
>  void sock_set_priority(struct sock *sk, u32 priority);
>  void sock_set_rcvbuf(struct sock *sk, int val);
>  void sock_set_mark(struct sock *sk, u32 val);
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index faf29fd82276..41b2bf140b89 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4769,9 +4769,7 @@ static int _bpf_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> int optname,
>  			ret = sock_bindtoindex(sk, ifindex, false);
>  			break;
>  		case SO_KEEPALIVE:
> -			if (sk->sk_prot->keepalive)
> -				sk->sk_prot->keepalive(sk, valbool);
> -			sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, valbool);
> +			sock_set_keepalive(sk, !!valbool);
>  			break;
>  		case SO_REUSEPORT:
>  			sk->sk_reuseport = valbool;
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 9671c32e6ef5..7041e6355ae1 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -892,12 +892,12 @@ int sock_set_timestamping(struct sock *sk, int
> optname,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> -void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk)
> +void sock_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk, bool valbool)
>  {
>  	lock_sock(sk);
>  	if (sk->sk_prot->keepalive)
> -		sk->sk_prot->keepalive(sk, true);
> -	sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, true);
> +		sk->sk_prot->keepalive(sk, valbool);
> +	sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, valbool);
>  	release_sock(sk);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_set_keepalive);
> @@ -1060,9 +1060,7 @@ int sock_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level,
> int optname,
>  		break;
>
>  	case SO_KEEPALIVE:
> -		if (sk->sk_prot->keepalive)
> -			sk->sk_prot->keepalive(sk, valbool);
> -		sock_valbool_flag(sk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, valbool);
> +		sock_set_keepalive(sk, !!valbool);
>  		break;
>
>  	case SO_OOBINLINE:
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
> index 8c03afac5ca0..879b8381055c 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
> @@ -81,9 +81,7 @@ static void mptcp_sol_socket_sync_intval(struct mptcp_sock
> *msk, int optname, in
>  			sock_valbool_flag(ssk, SOCK_DBG, !!val);
>  			break;
>  		case SO_KEEPALIVE:
> -			if (ssk->sk_prot->keepalive)
> -				ssk->sk_prot->keepalive(ssk, !!val);
> -			sock_valbool_flag(ssk, SOCK_KEEPOPEN, !!val);
> +			sock_set_keepalive(ssk, !!val);
>  			break;
>  		case SO_PRIORITY:
>  			ssk->sk_priority = val;
> diff --git a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> index 09cadd556d1e..b69ebb3f424a 100644
> --- a/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> +++ b/net/rds/tcp_listen.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void rds_tcp_keepalive(struct socket *sock)
>  	int keepidle = 5; /* send a probe 'keepidle' secs after last data */
>  	int keepcnt = 5; /* number of unack'ed probes before declaring dead */
>
> -	sock_set_keepalive(sock->sk);
> +	sock_set_keepalive(sock->sk, true);
>  	tcp_sock_set_keepcnt(sock->sk, keepcnt);
>  	tcp_sock_set_keepidle(sock->sk, keepidle);
>  	/* KEEPINTVL is the interval between successive probes. We follow
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 898389611ae8..ad8f4302037f 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void smc_set_keepalive(struct sock *sk, int val)
>  {
>  	struct smc_sock *smc = smc_sk(sk);
>
> -	smc->clcsock->sk->sk_prot->keepalive(smc->clcsock->sk, val);
> +	sock_set_keepalive(smc->clcsock->sk, !!val);
>  }
>
>  static struct smc_hashinfo smc_v4_hashinfo = {
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index e573dcecdd66..306a332f8d28 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -2127,7 +2127,7 @@ static void xs_tcp_set_socket_timeouts(struct rpc_xprt
> *xprt,
>  	spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock);
>
>  	/* TCP Keepalive options */
> -	sock_set_keepalive(sock->sk);
> +	sock_set_keepalive(sock->sk, true);
>  	tcp_sock_set_keepidle(sock->sk, keepidle);
>  	tcp_sock_set_keepintvl(sock->sk, keepidle);
>  	tcp_sock_set_keepcnt(sock->sk, keepcnt);
> --
> 2.32.0
>
>