lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 05:57:55 -0400 From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> To: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com> Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com, Baowen Zheng <baowen.zheng@...igine.com>, Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] flow_offload: allow user to offload tc action to net device On 2021-07-30 7:40 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote: > On Fri 30 Jul 2021 at 13:17, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote: >> On 2021-07-28 10:46 a.m., Simon Horman wrote: > > Filters with tunnel_key encap actions can be offloaded/unoffloaded > dynamically based on neigh state (see mlx5e_rep_neigh_update()) and fib > events (see mlx5e_tc_fib_event_work()). > Thanks. Will look and compare against the FIB case. cheers, jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists