lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49dbe558-cf18-484b-9167-e43ad1c83db5@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 13:00:30 +0300
From:   Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:     <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org>
CC:     <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ben.hutchings@...ensium.com>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
        <lokeshvutla@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw/emac: switch to use
 skb_put_padto()

hi Jakub, David,

On 06/08/2021 12:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org wrote:
> Hello:
> 
> This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
> 
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:55:52 +0300 you wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> Now frame padding in TI TI CPSW/EMAC is implemented in a bit of entangled way as
>> frame SKB padded in drivers (without skb->len) while frame length fixed in CPDMA.
>> Things became even more confusing hence CPSW switcdev driver need to perform min
>> TX frame length correction in switch mode [1].
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Here is the summary with links:
>    - [net-next,1/3] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: switch to use skb_put_padto()
>      https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1f88d5d566b8
>    - [net-next,2/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_emac: switch to use skb_put_padto()
>      https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/61e7a22da75b
>    - [net-next,3/3] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: drop frame padding
>      https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9ffc513f95ee

I'm terribly sorry for the mess here - this series depends from patch
"net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: fix min eth packet size for non-switch use-cases" [1]

Not sure what I've being thinking about I've had to note it or include in this series :(

I'm very sorry again - can it be dropped?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210805145511.12016-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com/

-- 
Best regards,
grygorii

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ