lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri,  6 Aug 2021 14:28:54 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...igine.com,
        Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>,
        Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] samples/bpf: xdpsock: Make the sample more useful outside the tree

From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>

The xdpsock sample application is a useful base for experiment's around
AF_XDP sockets. Compiling the sample outside of the kernel tree is made
harder then it has to be as the sample includes two headers and that are
not installed by 'make install_header' nor are usually part of
distributions kernel headers.

The first header asm/barrier.h is not used and can just be dropped.

The second linux/compiler.h are only needed for the decorator __force
and are only used in ip_fast_csum(), csum_fold() and
csum_tcpudp_nofold(). These functions are copied verbatim from
include/asm-generic/checksum.h and lib/checksum.c. While it's fine to
copy and use these functions in the sample application the decorator
brings no value and can be dropped together with the include.

With this change it's trivial to compile the xdpsock sample outside the
kernel tree from xdpsock_user.c and xdpsock.h.

    $ gcc -o xdpsock xdpsock_user.c -lbpf -lpthread

Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...igine.com>
Reviewed-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...igine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
---
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 33d0bdebbed8..7c56a7a784e1 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright(c) 2017 - 2018 Intel Corporation. */
 
-#include <asm/barrier.h>
 #include <errno.h>
 #include <getopt.h>
 #include <libgen.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
-#include <linux/compiler.h>
 #include <linux/if_link.h>
 #include <linux/if_xdp.h>
 #include <linux/if_ether.h>
@@ -663,7 +661,7 @@ __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl);
  */
 __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
 {
-	return (__force __sum16)~do_csum(iph, ihl * 4);
+	return (__sum16)~do_csum(iph, ihl * 4);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -673,11 +671,11 @@ __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
  */
 static inline __sum16 csum_fold(__wsum csum)
 {
-	u32 sum = (__force u32)csum;
+	u32 sum = (u32)csum;
 
 	sum = (sum & 0xffff) + (sum >> 16);
 	sum = (sum & 0xffff) + (sum >> 16);
-	return (__force __sum16)~sum;
+	return (__sum16)~sum;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -703,16 +701,16 @@ __wsum csum_tcpudp_nofold(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
 __wsum csum_tcpudp_nofold(__be32 saddr, __be32 daddr,
 			  __u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum sum)
 {
-	unsigned long long s = (__force u32)sum;
+	unsigned long long s = (u32)sum;
 
-	s += (__force u32)saddr;
-	s += (__force u32)daddr;
+	s += (u32)saddr;
+	s += (u32)daddr;
 #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
 	s += proto + len;
 #else
 	s += (proto + len) << 8;
 #endif
-	return (__force __wsum)from64to32(s);
+	return (__wsum)from64to32(s);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ