[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFj5m9+9asdQOCRHb0tZ=XSD-sOj+RLEDVEAObN81Z9y1JcgQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 23:51:58 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, mtosatti@...hat.com,
mingo@...nel.org, jbrandeb@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, abelits@...vell.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org, davem@...emloft.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
stephen@...workplumber.org, rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
chris.friesen@...driver.com, maz@...nel.org, nhorman@...driver.com,
pjwaskiewicz@...il.com, sassmann@...hat.com, thenzl@...hat.com,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
sumit.saxena@...adcom.com, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com,
sathya.prakash@...adcom.com, sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com,
suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com,
James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>,
dick.kennedy@...adcom.com, jkc@...hat.com, faisal.latif@...el.com,
shiraz.saleem@...el.com, tariqt@...dia.com, ahleihel@...hat.com,
kheib@...hat.com, borisp@...dia.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
benve@...co.com, govind@....com, jassisinghbrar@...il.com,
ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@...adcom.com,
somnath.kotur@...adcom.com, nilal@...hat.com,
tatyana.e.nikolova@...el.com, mustafa.ismail@...el.com,
ahs3@...hat.com, leonro@...dia.com,
chandrakanth.patil@...adcom.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com,
baolin.wang7@...il.com, poros@...hat.com,
Ewan Milne <emilne@...hat.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, _govind@....com,
kabel@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
Tushar.Khandelwal@....com, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/14] genirq: Provide new interfaces for affinity hints
On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 7:26 AM Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> The discussion about removing the side effect of irq_set_affinity_hint() of
> actually applying the cpumask (if not NULL) as affinity to the interrupt,
> unearthed a few unpleasantries:
>
> 1) The modular perf drivers rely on the current behaviour for the very
> wrong reasons.
>
> 2) While none of the other drivers prevents user space from changing
> the affinity, a cursorily inspection shows that there are at least
> expectations in some drivers.
>
> #1 needs to be cleaned up anyway, so that's not a problem
>
> #2 might result in subtle regressions especially when irqbalanced (which
> nowadays ignores the affinity hint) is disabled.
>
> Provide new interfaces:
>
> irq_update_affinity_hint() - Only sets the affinity hint pointer
> irq_set_affinity_and_hint() - Set the pointer and apply the affinity to
> the interrupt
>
> Make irq_set_affinity_hint() a wrapper around irq_apply_affinity_hint() and
> document it to be phased out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210501021832.743094-1-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists