lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb8fa6ad-10c8-e035-9bd8-1caf470e739e@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:59:20 +0530
From:   "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxwwan@...el.com
Subject: Re: wwan/iosm vs. xmm7360

Hi Jan,

What is the context of this request ?

FYI, the driver upstreamed is for M.2 7560.

Regards,
Chetan

On 8/6/2021 2:09 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Chetan,
> 
> at the risk of having missed this being answered already:
> 
> How close is the older xmm7360 to the now supported xmm7560 in mainline?
> 
> There is that reverse engineered PCI driver [1] with non-standard
> userland interface, and it would obviously be great to benefit from
> common infrastructure and specifically the modem-manager compatible
> interface. Is this realistic to achieve for the 7360, or is that
> hardware or its firmware too different?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> [1] https://github.com/xmm7360/xmm7360-pci
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ