[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210807142259.GB22362@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 07:22:59 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc: Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rui Sousa <rui.sousa@....com>,
Sebastien Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....com>
Subject: Re: [net-next, v5, 02/11] ptp: support ptp physical/virtual clocks
conversion
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 06:15:29PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > int ptp_clock_unregister(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
> > {
> > + if (ptp_vclock_in_use(ptp)) {
> > + pr_err("ptp: virtual clock in use\n");
> > + return -EBUSY;
> > + }
> > +
>
> None of the drivers (that I looked) expect ptp_clock_unregister() to
> return an error.
>
> So, what should we do?
> 1. Fix all the drivers to return an error on module unloading (that's
> usually the path ptp_clock_unregister() is called)?
> 2. Remove all the PTP virtual clocks when the physical clock is
> unregistered?
This:
3. Let the vclocks hold a reference to the underlying posix dynamic clock.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists