netdev - Re: [V2][PATCH] atm: horizon: Fix spelling mistakes in TX comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7afa073ece002f84f4f2c28b3ac3032ded94bf43.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 07 Aug 2021 09:58:14 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Jun Miao <jun.miao@...driver.com>, 3chas3@...il.com
Cc:     linux-atm-general@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V2][PATCH] atm: horizon: Fix spelling mistakes in TX comment

On Sat, 2021-08-07 at 23:38 +0800, Jun Miao wrote:
> It's "must not", not "musn't", meaning "shall not".
> Let's fix that.
> 
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jun Miao <jun.miao@...driver.com>
> ---
>  drivers/atm/horizon.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/atm/horizon.c b/drivers/atm/horizon.c
> index 4f2951cbe69c..9ee494bc5c51 100644
> --- a/drivers/atm/horizon.c
> +++ b/drivers/atm/horizon.c
> @@ -2167,10 +2167,10 @@ static int hrz_open (struct atm_vcc *atm_vcc)
>    
> 
>    // Part of the job is done by atm_pcr_goal which gives us a PCR
>    // specification which says: EITHER grab the maximum available PCR
> -  // (and perhaps a lower bound which we musn't pass), OR grab this
> +  // (and perhaps a lower bound which we mustn't pass), OR grab this

I meant to suggest you change the patch to use "must not" not
the commit message.

>    // amount, rounding down if you have to (and perhaps a lower bound
> -  // which we musn't pass) OR grab this amount, rounding up if you
> -  // have to (and perhaps an upper bound which we musn't pass). If any
> +  // which we mustn't pass) OR grab this amount, rounding up if you
> +  // have to (and perhaps an upper bound which we mustn't pass). If any
>    // bounds ARE passed we fail. Note that rounding is only rounding to
>    // match device limitations, we do not round down to satisfy
>    // bandwidth availability even if this would not violate any given