netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G2L SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210809181348.w64v6dryf7qlill5@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 9 Aug 2021 20:13:48 +0200
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
        Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd:
 Document RZ/G2L SoC

On 09.08.2021 16:48:20, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > > +    interrupt-names:
> > > +      items:
> > > +        - const: ch_int
> > > +        - const: g_int
> >
> > Are you adding the new interrupt-names to the existing DTs, too?
> > Otherwise this patch will generate more warnings in the existing DTs.
> >
> For non RZ/G2L family interrupt-names property is not marked as
> required property so dtbs_check won't complain. Once we have added
> interrupt names in all the SoC DTSI's we will mark it as required
> property for the rest of the SoC's.

That makes sense! Thanks for the explanation.

regards,
Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)