netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sock: add the case if sk is NULL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <489e6f1ce9f8de6fd8765d82e1e47827@linux.dev>
Date:   Mon, 09 Aug 2021 06:12:55 +0000
From:   yajun.deng@...ux.dev
To:     "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sock: add the case if sk is NULL

August 6, 2021 9:11 PM, "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 14:38:15 +0800 Yajun Deng wrote:
> 
>> Add the case if sk is NULL in sock_{put, hold},
>> The caller is free to use it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>
> 
> The obvious complaint about this patch (and your previous netdev patch)
> is that you're spraying branches everywhere in the code. Sure, it may

Sorry for that, I'll be more normative in later submission.
> be okay for free(), given how expensive of an operation that is but
> is having refcounting functions accept NULL really the best practice?
> 
> Can you give us examples in the kernel where that's the case?

0   include/net/neighbour.h         neigh_clone()
1   include/linux/cgroup.h          get_cgroup_ns() and put_cgroup_ns()  (This is very similar to my submission)
2   include/linux/ipc_namespace.h   get_ipc_ns()
3   include/linux/posix_acl.h       posix_acl_dup()
4   include/linux/pid.h             get_pid()
5   include/linux/user_namespace.h  get_user_ns()