[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0bb57862-c8aa-0279-84ae-77f9cbdc47c2@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 23:41:31 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jussi Maki <joamaki@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
j.vosburgh@...il.com, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
vfalico@...il.com, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add tests for XDP bonding
On 8/9/21 4:24 PM, Jussi Maki wrote:
[...]
>>> + if (!test__start_subtest("xdp_bonding_redirect_multi"))
>>> + test_xdp_bonding_redirect_multi(&skeletons);
>>> +
>>> +out:
>>> + xdp_dummy__destroy(skeletons.xdp_dummy);
>>> + xdp_tx__destroy(skeletons.xdp_tx);
>>> + xdp_redirect_multi_kern__destroy(skeletons.xdp_redirect_multi_kern);
>>> +
>>> + libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
>>> + if (root_netns_fd)
>>
>> technically, fd could be 0, so for fds we have if (fd >= 0)
>> everywhere. Also, if open() above fails, root_netns_fd will be -1 and
>> you'll still attempt to close it.
>
> Good catch. Daniel, could you fix this when applying to be "if
> (root_netns_fd >= 0)"?
Yep, done now, I had to rebase due to 220ade77452c ("bonding: 3ad: fix the concurrency
between __bond_release_one() and bond_3ad_state_machine_handler()") which this series
here didn't take into account. Please double check.
Thanks everyone,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists