[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210809093437.876558-7-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 11:34:36 +0200
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc: kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
illusionist.neo@...il.com, zlim.lnx@...il.com,
paulburton@...nel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
sandipan@...ux.ibm.com, luke.r.nels@...il.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
iii@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, udknight@...il.com,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] mips: bpf: Fix off-by-one in tail call count limiting
Before, the eBPF JIT allowed up to MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 tail calls.
Now, precisely MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT is allowed, which is in line with the
behaviour of the interpreter. Verified with the test_bpf test suite
on qemu-system-mips64.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
---
arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
index 3a73e9375712..a93121d71c80 100644
--- a/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/mips/net/ebpf_jit.c
@@ -617,14 +617,14 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int this_idx)
b_off = b_imm(this_idx + 1, ctx);
emit_instr(ctx, bne, MIPS_R_AT, MIPS_R_ZERO, b_off);
/*
- * if (TCC-- < 0)
+ * if (TCC-- <= 0)
* goto out;
*/
/* Delay slot */
tcc_reg = (ctx->flags & EBPF_TCC_IN_V1) ? MIPS_R_V1 : MIPS_R_S4;
emit_instr(ctx, daddiu, MIPS_R_T5, tcc_reg, -1);
b_off = b_imm(this_idx + 1, ctx);
- emit_instr(ctx, bltz, tcc_reg, b_off);
+ emit_instr(ctx, blez, tcc_reg, b_off);
/*
* prog = array->ptrs[index];
* if (prog == NULL)
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists