netdev - Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: dsa: sja1105: fix error handling on NULL returned by xpcs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210810083312.GA30383@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:33:12 +0800
From:   Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net: dsa: sja1105: fix error handling on NULL
 returned by xpcs_create()

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 08:25:29AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Hi VK,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 02:35:13PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > There is a possibility xpcs_create() returned a NULL and this is not
> > handled properly in the sja1105 driver.
> > 
> > Fixed this by using IS_ERR_ON_NULL() instead of IS_ERR().
> > 
> > Fixes: 3ad1d171548e ("net: dsa: sja1105: migrate to xpcs for SGMII")
> > Cc: Vladimir Olten <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > index 19aea8fb76f6..2c69a759ce6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_mdio.c
> > @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ static int sja1105_mdiobus_pcs_register(struct sja1105_private *priv)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		xpcs = xpcs_create(mdiodev, priv->phy_mode[port]);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(xpcs)) {
> > +		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(xpcs)) {
> >  			rc = PTR_ERR(xpcs);
> >  			goto out_pcs_free;
> >  		}
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1
> > 
> 
> I think posting to 'net' is a bit drastic for this patch. I agree it is
> an issue but it has bothered absolutely nobody so far, and if sending
> this patch to 'net' means you'll be blocked with your patches until the
> 'net'->'net-next' merge, I'm not sure it's worth it.
>

Sounds reasonable for me. I will marked V2 to target net-next.
 
> Anyway, I don't think that PTR_ERR(xpcs) does the right thing when
> IS_NULL(xpcs). So how about you make this change:
> 
> -----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> index a5d150c5f3d8..ca12bf986d4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ int stmmac_xpcs_setup(struct mii_bus *bus)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		xpcs = xpcs_create(mdiodev, mode);
> -		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(xpcs)) {
> +		if (IS_ERR(xpcs)) {
>  			mdio_device_free(mdiodev);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> index 63fda3fc40aa..4bd61339823c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> @@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ struct dw_xpcs *xpcs_create(struct mdio_device *mdiodev,
>  
>  	xpcs = kzalloc(sizeof(*xpcs), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!xpcs)
> -		return NULL;
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  
>  	xpcs->mdiodev = mdiodev;
>  
> -----------------------------[ cut here ]-----------------------------