[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210811202019.seskua7bzagxis7u@skbuf>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:20:19 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Prasanna Vengateshan <prasanna.vengateshan@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 05/10] net: dsa: microchip: add DSA support
for microchip lan937x
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:14:14PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 08:23:04PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I hope that using "*-internal-delay-ps" for Mac would be the right option.
> > > Shall i include these changes as we discussed in next revision of the patch?
> >
> > Yes, that seems sensible. But please limit them to the CPU port. Maybe
> > return -EINVAL for other ports.
>
> Hmm. Don't we want ports that are "MAC like" to behave "MAC like" ?
> In other words, shouldn't a DSA port that can be connected to an
> external PHY should accept the same properties as a conventional
> Ethernet MAC e.g. in a SoC device?
+1, I thought the whole purpose of the discussion was to stop singling
out the CPU port as being special in any way w.r.t. RGMII delays.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists