netdev - Re: [PATCH] net:sched fix array-index-out-of-bounds in taprio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <303b095e-3342-9461-16ae-86d0923b7dc7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 09:44:41 +0200
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     tcs.kernel@...il.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:sched fix array-index-out-of-bounds in taprio_change



On 8/11/21 7:10 AM, tcs.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> From: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
> 
> syzbot report an array-index-out-of-bounds in taprio_change
> index 16 is out of range for type '__u16 [16]'
> that's because mqprio->num_tc is lager than TC_MAX_QUEUE,so we check
> the return value of netdev_set_num_tc.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+2b3e5fb6c7ef285a94f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
> ---
>  net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> index 9c79374..1ab2fc9 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1513,7 +1513,9 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
>  	taprio_set_picos_per_byte(dev, q);
>  
>  	if (mqprio) {
> -		netdev_set_num_tc(dev, mqprio->num_tc);
> +		err = netdev_set_num_tc(dev, mqprio->num_tc);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto free_sched;
>  		for (i = 0; i < mqprio->num_tc; i++)
>  			netdev_set_tc_queue(dev, i,
>  					    mqprio->count[i],
> 

When was the bug added ?

Hint: Please provide a Fixes: tag

taprio_parse_mqprio_opt() already checks :

/* Verify num_tc is not out of max range */
if (qopt->num_tc > TC_MAX_QUEUE) {
    NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Number of traffic classes is outside valid range");
    return -EINVAL;
}

So what is happening exactly ?