[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eaf6c96c-c942-05c3-ce66-0fa9821bf118@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 01:40:53 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 4/8] net: dsa: b53: express
b53_for_each_port in terms of dsa_switch_for_each_port
On 8/10/2021 9:14 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Merging the two allows us to remove the open-coded
> "dev->enabled_ports & BIT(i)" check from b53_br_join and b53_br_leave,
> while still avoiding a quadratic iteration through the switch's ports.
>
> Sadly I don't know if it's possible to completely get rid of
> b53_for_each_port and replace it with dsa_switch_for_each_available_port,
> especially for the platforms that use pdata and not OF bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists