netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210811090930.mormg24hnnle7qq3@steredhat>
Date:   Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:09:30 +0200
From:   Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To:     Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
Cc:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stsp2@...dex.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] af_vsock: rename variables in receive loop

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 02:41:00PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>Record is supported via MSG_EOR flag, while current logic operates
>with message, so rename variables from 'record' to 'message'.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 3e02cc3b24f8..e2c0cfb334d2 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> {
> 	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
> 	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>-	ssize_t record_len;
>+	ssize_t msg_len;
> 	long timeout;
> 	int err = 0;
> 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>@@ -2028,9 +2028,9 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	if (err <= 0)
> 		goto out;
>
>-	record_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>+	msg_len = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags);
>
>-	if (record_len < 0) {
>+	if (msg_len < 0) {
> 		err = -ENOMEM;
> 		goto out;
> 	}
>@@ -2044,14 +2044,14 @@ static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> 		 * packet.
> 		 */
> 		if (flags & MSG_TRUNC)
>-			err = record_len;
>+			err = msg_len;
> 		else
> 			err = len - msg_data_left(msg);
>
> 		/* Always set MSG_TRUNC if real length of packet is
> 		 * bigger than user's buffer.
> 		 */
>-		if (record_len > len)
>+		if (msg_len > len)
> 			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> 	}
>
>-- 
>2.25.1
>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>