netdev - Re: signed integer overflow in atomic.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:07:44 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: signed integer overflow in atomic.h

On 8/11/21 10:41 PM, Steve French wrote:
> ===============
> [   28.345189] UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:165:11
> [   28.345196] 484501395 + 2024361625 cannot be represented in type 'int'
> [   28.345202] CPU: 6 PID: 987 Comm: nmbd Not tainted 5.11.22 #1
> [   28.345208] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
> [   28.345212] Call Trace:
> [   28.345218]  dump_stack+0x8d/0xb5
> [   28.345233]  ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x50
> [   28.345242]  handle_overflow+0xa3/0xb0
> [   28.345257]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x39/0x80
> [   28.345270]  ip_idents_reserve+0x8d/0xb0
> [   28.345283]  __ip_select_ident+0x3f/0x70
> [   28.345292]  __ip_make_skb+0x279/0x450
> [   28.345302]  ? ip_reply_glue_bits+0x40/0x40
> [   28.345314]  ip_make_skb+0x10d/0x130
> [   28.345326]  ? ip_route_output_key_hash+0xee/0x190
> [   28.345344]  udp_sendmsg+0x79b/0x13b0
> [   28.345365]  ? ip_reply_glue_bits+0x40/0x40
> [   28.345403]  ? find_held_lock+0x29/0xb0
> [   28.345420]  ? sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60
> [   28.345426]  sock_sendmsg+0x54/0x60

from net/ipv4/route.c:

	/* If UBSAN reports an error there, please make sure your compiler
	 * supports -fno-strict-overflow before reporting it that was a bug
	 * in UBSAN, and it has been fixed in GCC-8.
	 */
	return atomic_add_return(segs + delta, p_id) - segs;


-- 
~Randy