[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210812105321.0de11e3e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:53:21 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: tcs.kernel@...il.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com
Cc: jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:sched fix array-index-out-of-bounds in
taprio_change
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 13:10:09 +0800 tcs.kernel@...il.com wrote:
> From: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
>
> syzbot report an array-index-out-of-bounds in taprio_change
> index 16 is out of range for type '__u16 [16]'
> that's because mqprio->num_tc is lager than TC_MAX_QUEUE,so we check
> the return value of netdev_set_num_tc.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+2b3e5fb6c7ef285a94f6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <tcs_kernel@...cent.com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> index 9c79374..1ab2fc9 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1513,7 +1513,9 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
> taprio_set_picos_per_byte(dev, q);
>
> if (mqprio) {
> - netdev_set_num_tc(dev, mqprio->num_tc);
> + err = netdev_set_num_tc(dev, mqprio->num_tc);
> + if (err)
> + goto free_sched;
taprio_set_picos_per_byte() already got called and applied some of the
changes. It seems like the early return from taprio_parse_mqprio_opt()
if dev->num_tc is non-zero is incorrect. That function is supposed to
validate that mqprio_opt() is correct AFAIU. That would mean:
Fixes: a3d43c0d56f1 ("taprio: Add support adding an admin schedule")
Vinicius - WDYT?
> for (i = 0; i < mqprio->num_tc; i++)
> netdev_set_tc_queue(dev, i,
> mqprio->count[i],
Powered by blists - more mailing lists