netdev - [PATCH] af_unix: fix holding spinlock in oob handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210813174629.646768-1-Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 10:46:29 -0700
From:   Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@...cle.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, rao.shoaib@...cle.com,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] af_unix: fix holding spinlock in oob handling

From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>

syzkaller found that OOB code was holding spinlock
while calling a function in which it could sleep.
Also addressed comments from edumazet@...gle.com.

Reported-by: syzbot+8760ca6c1ee783ac4abd@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 314001f0bf92 ("af_unix: Add OOB support")
Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 00d8b08cdbe1..0f59fed993d8 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -1891,7 +1891,6 @@ static int queue_oob(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *other
 		return err;
 
 	skb_put(skb, 1);
-	skb->len = 1;
 	err = skb_copy_datagram_from_iter(skb, 0, &msg->msg_iter, 1);
 
 	if (err) {
@@ -1900,11 +1899,19 @@ static int queue_oob(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *other
 	}
 
 	unix_state_lock(other);
+
+	if (sock_flag(other, SOCK_DEAD) ||
+	    (other->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)) {
+		unix_state_unlock(other);
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return -EPIPE;
+	}
+
 	maybe_add_creds(skb, sock, other);
 	skb_get(skb);
 
 	if (ousk->oob_skb)
-		kfree_skb(ousk->oob_skb);
+		consume_skb(ousk->oob_skb);
 
 	ousk->oob_skb = skb;
 
@@ -2362,19 +2369,37 @@ static int unix_stream_recv_urg(struct unix_stream_read_state *state)
 	struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
 	int chunk = 1;
+	struct sk_buff *oob_skb;
+
+	mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
+	unix_state_lock(sk);
 
-	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE) || !u->oob_skb)
+	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_URGINLINE) || !u->oob_skb) {
+		unix_state_unlock(sk);
+		mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
-	chunk = state->recv_actor(u->oob_skb, 0, chunk, state);
-	if (chunk < 0)
-		return -EFAULT;
+	oob_skb = u->oob_skb;
 
 	if (!(state->flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
-		UNIXCB(u->oob_skb).consumed += 1;
-		kfree_skb(u->oob_skb);
 		u->oob_skb = NULL;
 	}
+
+	unix_state_unlock(sk);
+
+	chunk = state->recv_actor(oob_skb, 0, chunk, state);
+
+	if (!(state->flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
+		UNIXCB(oob_skb).consumed += 1;
+		kfree_skb(oob_skb);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
+
+	if (chunk < 0)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
 	state->msg->msg_flags |= MSG_OOB;
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -2434,13 +2459,7 @@ static int unix_stream_read_generic(struct unix_stream_read_state *state,
 	if (unlikely(flags & MSG_OOB)) {
 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AF_UNIX_OOB)
-		mutex_lock(&u->iolock);
-		unix_state_lock(sk);
-
 		err = unix_stream_recv_urg(state);
-
-		unix_state_unlock(sk);
-		mutex_unlock(&u->iolock);
 #endif
 		goto out;
 	}
-- 
2.27.0