netdev - Re: [PATCH 39/64] mac80211: Use memset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Aug 2021 20:19:36 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/64] mac80211: Use memset_after() to clear tx status

On Fri, 2021-08-13 at 09:08 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > 
> > The common helper should also clear ack_signal, but that was broken by
> > commit e3e1a0bcb3f1 ("mac80211: reduce IEEE80211_TX_MAX_RATES"), because
> > that commit changed the order of the fields and updated carl9170 and p54
> > properly but not the common helper...
> 
> It looks like p54 actually uses the rates, which is why it does this
> manually. I can't see why carl9170 does this manually, though.

mac80211 also uses the rates later again on status reporting, it just
expects the # of attempts to be filled etc. I haven't looked at
carl9170, but I would expect it to do something there and do it
correctly, even though old it's a well-written driver and uses mac80211
rate control, so this would need to be correct for decent performance.

But I guess it could be that the helper could be used because the rates
were already handed to the firmware, and the code was just copy/pasted
from p54 (the drivers were, IIRC, developed by the same folks)

johannes