netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] qed: qed ll2 race condition fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 Aug 2021 08:18:07 +0000
From:   Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
        "malin1024@...il.com" <malin1024@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qed: qed ll2 race condition fixes

On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 03:05:00 + 0300 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 22:53:13 +0300 Shai Malin wrote:
> > Avoiding qed ll2 race condition and NULL pointer dereference as part
> > of the remove and recovery flows.
> >
> > Changes form V1:
> > - Change (!p_rx->set_prod_addr).
> > - qed_ll2.c checkpatch fixes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shai Malin <smalin@...vell.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c
> > index 02a4610d9330..9a9f0c516c0c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_ll2.c
> > @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static int qed_ll2_alloc_buffer(struct qed_dev *cdev,
> >  }
> >
> >  static int qed_ll2_dealloc_buffer(struct qed_dev *cdev,
> > -				 struct qed_ll2_buffer *buffer)
> > +				  struct qed_ll2_buffer *buffer)
> >  {
> >  	spin_lock_bh(&cdev->ll2->lock);
> >
> 
> > @@ -670,11 +682,11 @@ static int qed_ll2_lb_rxq_handler(struct qed_hwfn
> *p_hwfn,
> >  		p_pkt = list_first_entry(&p_rx->active_descq,
> >  					 struct qed_ll2_rx_packet, list_entry);
> >
> > -		if ((iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_NEW_ISLE) ||
> > -		    (iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_ISLE_RIGHT) ||
> > -		    (iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_ISLE_LEFT) ||
> > -		    (iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_PEN) ||
> > -		    (iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_JOIN)) {
> > +		if (iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_NEW_ISLE ||
> > +		    iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_ISLE_RIGHT ||
> > +		    iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_ISLE_LEFT ||
> > +		    iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_ADD_PEN ||
> > +		    iscsi_ooo->ooo_opcode == TCP_EVENT_JOIN) {
> >  			if (!p_pkt) {
> >  				DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn,
> >  					  "LL2 OOO RX packet is not valid\n");
> 
> Sorry, I missed this before, please don't mix code clean up into
> unrelated patches. Especially into fixes. Same goes for your other
> patch (qed: Fix null-pointer dereference in qed_rdma_create_qp()).

Sure.