[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YRnlP/9oimKRbn0q@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 06:10:39 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: phy: marvell10g: Add WAKE_PHY support
to WOL event
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:19:34AM +0000, Song, Yoong Siang wrote:
> > > How does this work if the driver has no interrupt support? What is the
> > > hardware setup this has been tested with?
> >
> > Hi Russell
> >
> > We already know from previous patches that the Intel hardware is broken,
> > and does not actually deliver the interrupt which caused the wake up. So i
> > assume this just continues on with the same broken hardware, but they have
> > a different PHY connected.
>
> Hi Russell & Andrew,
>
> This is tested on Intel Elkhart Lake (EHL) board. We are using polling mode.
> Both WoL interrupt and link change interrupt are the same pin which is
> routed to PMC. PMC will wake up the system when there is WoL event.
Is the PMC also an interrupt controller?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists