lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJWrCJb6JJtQVurM3UexPwqz1OuydE9NvxyRwBb5hD=7aQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Aug 2021 21:20:34 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     David Thompson <davthompson@...dia.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@...dia.com>,
        Liming Sun <limings@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: mlxbf2: Drop wrong use of ACPI_PTR()

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:00 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case
> if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused which is not what we want.
>
> Instead of adding ifdeffery here and there, drop ACPI_PTR() and
> replace acpi.h with mod_devicetable.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> index 68c471c10fa4..c0aa622fef76 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mlxbf2.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -8,6 +7,7 @@
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/pm.h>
> @@ -307,14 +307,14 @@ static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(mlxbf2_pm_ops, mlxbf2_gpio_suspend, mlxbf2_gpio_resume)
>
>  static const struct acpi_device_id __maybe_unused mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match[] = {
>         { "MLNXBF22", 0 },
> -       {},
> +       {}

Ninja change :) I removed it - send a separate patch for this if you want to.

Bart

>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match);
>
>  static struct platform_driver mlxbf2_gpio_driver = {
>         .driver = {
>                 .name = "mlxbf2_gpio",
> -               .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match),
> +               .acpi_match_table = mlxbf2_gpio_acpi_match,
>                 .pm = &mlxbf2_pm_ops,
>         },
>         .probe    = mlxbf2_gpio_probe,
> --
> 2.30.2
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ