[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b3cb059-9ecb-a0c9-3c99-805788088d09@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 23:43:21 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use kvmalloc in map_lookup_elem
On 8/16/21 6:48 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Use kvmalloc/kvfree for temporary value when looking up a map.
> kmalloc might not be sufficient for percpu maps where the value is big.
>
> Can be reproduced with netcnt test on qemu with "-smp 255".
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 9a2068e39d23..ae0b1c1c8ece 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static int map_lookup_elem(union bpf_attr *attr)
> value_size = bpf_map_value_size(map);
>
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - value = kmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> + value = kvmalloc(value_size, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
> if (!value)
> goto free_key;
What about other cases like map_update_elem(), shouldn't they be adapted
similarly?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists