[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210816235400.GA24680@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:54:01 -0700
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, nikolay@...dia.com, cong.wang@...edance.com,
colin.king@...onical.com, gustavoars@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/7] ptp: Add interface for acquiring DPLL state
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 06:07:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote:
> Previously there was no common interface for monitoring
> synchronization state of Digital Phase Locked Loop.
>
> Add interface through PTP ioctl subsystem for tools,
> as well as sysfs human-friendly part of the interface.
>
> enum dpll_state moved to uapi definition, it is required to
> have common definition of DPLL states in uapi.
This has nothing to do with PTP, right?
So why isn't it a RTNL feature instead?
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists