| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <44581a43-daff-b05e-ee5a-45969ccb3d8c@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 10:44:24 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: bongsu.jeon2@...il.com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] selftests: Add the NCI testcase reading T4T
Tag
On 16/08/2021 06:06, bongsu.jeon2@...il.com wrote:
> From: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
>
> Add the NCI testcase reading T4T Tag that has NFC TEST plain text.
> the virtual device application acts as T4T Tag in this testcase.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c | 384 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 345 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> index 34e76c7fa1fe..65d887dc5ccc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,29 @@ const __u8 nci_init_rsp_v2[] = {0x40, 0x01, 0x1c, 0x00, 0x1a, 0x7e, 0x06,
> const __u8 nci_rf_disc_map_rsp[] = {0x41, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00};
> const __u8 nci_rf_disc_rsp[] = {0x41, 0x03, 0x01, 0x00};
> const __u8 nci_rf_deact_rsp[] = {0x41, 0x06, 0x01, 0x00};
> +const __u8 nci_rf_deact_ntf[] = {0x61, 0x06, 0x02, 0x00, 0x00};
> +const __u8 nci_rf_activate_ntf[] = {0x61, 0x05, 0x1D, 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x00,
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x0C, 0x44, 0x03, 0x07, 0x04,
> + 0x62, 0x26, 0x11, 0x80, 0x1D, 0x80, 0x01,
> + 0x20, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x06, 0x05, 0x75,
> + 0x77, 0x81, 0x02, 0x80};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_select_cmd[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x0C, 0x00, 0xA4, 0x04, 0x00,
> + 0x07, 0xD2, 0x76, 0x00, 0x00, 0x85, 0x01, 0x01};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_select_cmd2[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0xA4, 0x00, 0x0C, 0x02,
> + 0xE1, 0x03};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_select_cmd3[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x07, 0x00, 0xA4, 0x00, 0x0C, 0x02,
> + 0xE1, 0x04};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_cmd[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xB0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0F};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_rsp[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x11, 0x00, 0x0F, 0x20, 0x00, 0x3B,
> + 0x00, 0x34, 0x04, 0x06, 0xE1, 0x04, 0x08, 0x00,
> + 0x00, 0x00, 0x90, 0x00};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_cmd2[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xB0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_rsp2[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x04, 0x00, 0x0F, 0x90, 0x00};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_cmd3[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x05, 0x00, 0xB0, 0x00, 0x02, 0x0F};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_read_rsp3[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x11, 0xD1, 0x01, 0x0B, 0x54, 0x02,
> + 0x65, 0x6E, 0x4E, 0x46, 0x43, 0x20, 0x54, 0x45,
> + 0x53, 0x54, 0x90, 0x00};
> +const __u8 nci_t4t_rsp_ok[] = {0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x90, 0x00};
>
> struct msgtemplate {
> struct nlmsghdr n;
> @@ -87,7 +110,7 @@ static int create_nl_socket(void)
>
> static int send_cmd_mt_nla(int sd, __u16 nlmsg_type, __u32 nlmsg_pid,
> __u8 genl_cmd, int nla_num, __u16 nla_type[],
> - void *nla_data[], int nla_len[])
> + void *nla_data[], int nla_len[], __u16 flags)
> {
> struct sockaddr_nl nladdr;
> struct msgtemplate msg;
> @@ -98,7 +121,7 @@ static int send_cmd_mt_nla(int sd, __u16 nlmsg_type, __u32 nlmsg_pid,
>
> msg.n.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(GENL_HDRLEN);
> msg.n.nlmsg_type = nlmsg_type;
> - msg.n.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST;
> + msg.n.nlmsg_flags = flags;
> msg.n.nlmsg_seq = 0;
> msg.n.nlmsg_pid = nlmsg_pid;
> msg.g.cmd = genl_cmd;
> @@ -108,12 +131,12 @@ static int send_cmd_mt_nla(int sd, __u16 nlmsg_type, __u32 nlmsg_pid,
> for (cnt = 0; cnt < nla_num; cnt++) {
> na = (struct nlattr *)(GENLMSG_DATA(&msg) + prv_len);
> na->nla_type = nla_type[cnt];
> - na->nla_len = nla_len[cnt] + NLA_HDRLEN;
> + na->nla_len = NLMSG_ALIGN(nla_len[cnt] + NLA_HDRLEN);
>
> if (nla_len > 0)
> memcpy(NLA_DATA(na), nla_data[cnt], nla_len[cnt]);
>
> - msg.n.nlmsg_len += NLMSG_ALIGN(na->nla_len);
> + msg.n.nlmsg_len += na->nla_len;
> prv_len = na->nla_len;
> }
>
> @@ -146,11 +169,11 @@ static int send_get_nfc_family(int sd, __u32 pid)
> nla_get_family_data = family_name;
>
> return send_cmd_mt_nla(sd, GENL_ID_CTRL, pid, CTRL_CMD_GETFAMILY,
> - 1, &nla_get_family_type,
> - &nla_get_family_data, &nla_get_family_len);
> + 1, &nla_get_family_type, &nla_get_family_data,
> + &nla_get_family_len, NLM_F_REQUEST);
> }
>
> -static int get_family_id(int sd, __u32 pid)
> +static int get_family_id(int sd, __u32 pid, __u32 *event_group)
> {
> struct {
> struct nlmsghdr n;
> @@ -158,8 +181,9 @@ static int get_family_id(int sd, __u32 pid)
> char buf[512];
> } ans;
> struct nlattr *na;
> - int rep_len;
> + int resp_len;
Here and in other places - all these renames rep_len->resp_len do not
look like related to the commit, so please split these to separate commit.
> __u16 id;
> + int len;
> int rc;
>
> rc = send_get_nfc_family(sd, pid);
> @@ -167,17 +191,49 @@ static int get_family_id(int sd, __u32 pid)
> if (rc < 0)
> return 0;
>
> - rep_len = recv(sd, &ans, sizeof(ans), 0);
> + resp_len = recv(sd, &ans, sizeof(ans), 0);
>
> - if (ans.n.nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR || rep_len < 0 ||
> - !NLMSG_OK(&ans.n, rep_len))
> + if (ans.n.nlmsg_type == NLMSG_ERROR || resp_len < 0 ||
> + !NLMSG_OK(&ans.n, resp_len))
> return 0;
>
> + len = 0;
> + resp_len = GENLMSG_PAYLOAD(&ans.n);
> na = (struct nlattr *)GENLMSG_DATA(&ans);
> - na = (struct nlattr *)((char *)na + NLA_ALIGN(na->nla_len));
> - if (na->nla_type == CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_ID)
> - id = *(__u16 *)NLA_DATA(na);
>
> + while (len < resp_len) {
> + len += NLA_ALIGN(na->nla_len);
> + if (na->nla_type == CTRL_ATTR_FAMILY_ID) {
> + id = *(__u16 *)NLA_DATA(na);
> + } else if (na->nla_type == CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GROUPS) {
> + struct nlattr *nested_na;
> + struct nlattr *group_na;
> + int group_attr_len;
> + int group_attr;
> +
> + nested_na = (struct nlattr *)((char *)na + NLA_HDRLEN);
> + group_na = (struct nlattr *)((char *)nested_na + NLA_HDRLEN);
> + group_attr_len = 0;
> +
> + for (group_attr = CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GRP_UNSPEC;
> + group_attr < CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GRP_MAX; group_attr++) {
> + if (group_na->nla_type == CTRL_ATTR_MCAST_GRP_ID) {
> + *event_group = *(__u32 *)((char *)group_na +
> + NLA_HDRLEN);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + group_attr_len += NLA_ALIGN(group_na->nla_len) +
> + NLA_HDRLEN;
> + if (group_attr_len >= nested_na->nla_len)
> + break;
> +
> + group_na = (struct nlattr *)((char *)group_na +
> + NLA_ALIGN(group_na->nla_len));
> + }
> + }
> + na = (struct nlattr *)(GENLMSG_DATA(&ans) + len);
> + }
> return id;
> }
>
> @@ -189,12 +245,13 @@ static int send_cmd_with_idx(int sd, __u16 nlmsg_type, __u32 nlmsg_pid,
> int nla_len = 4;
>
> return send_cmd_mt_nla(sd, nlmsg_type, nlmsg_pid, genl_cmd, 1,
> - &nla_type, &nla_data, &nla_len);
> + &nla_type, &nla_data, &nla_len, NLM_F_REQUEST);
> }
>
> -static int get_nci_devid(int sd, __u16 fid, __u32 pid, int dev_id, struct msgtemplate *msg)
> +static int get_nci_devid(int sd, __u16 fid, __u32 pid, int dev_id,
> + struct msgtemplate *msg)
Does not look related.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists