[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QXGZ1UrEpv7uZSJGuoM434kVbphOVQ79T45RQYYUg=jGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:35:49 +0800
From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
syzbot+b9cfd1cc5d57ee0a09ab@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: xfrm: fix bug in ipcomp_free_scratches
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 3:53 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 03:38:29PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> >
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> > - vfree(*per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i));
> > + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> > + void *scratch = *per_cpu_ptr(scratches, i);
> > + if (!scratch)
> > + vfree(scratch);
> > + }
>
> This patch is unnecessary. Please check the implementation of
> vfree, it already checks for NULL pointers just like most of our
> free primitives.
Yes, you're right. Let me double-check the code and find out where the
problem is.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
> PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists