netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net-memcg: pass in gfp_t mask to mem_cgroup_charge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:50:05 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, guro@...com,
        edumazet@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net-memcg: pass in gfp_t mask to
 mem_cgroup_charge_skmem()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 12:40:03 -0700 you wrote:
> Add gfp_t mask as an input parameter to mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(),
> to give more control to the networking stack and enable it to change
> memcg charging behavior. In the future, the networking stack may decide
> to avoid oom-kills when fallbacks are more appropriate.
> 
> One behavior change in mem_cgroup_charge_skmem() by this patch is to
> avoid force charging by default and let the caller decide when and if
> force charging is needed through the presence or absence of
> __GFP_NOFAIL.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] net-memcg: pass in gfp_t mask to mem_cgroup_charge_skmem()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/4b1327be9fe5

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html