lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <811eb35f-5c8b-1591-1e68-8856420b4578@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:54:40 +0200
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To:     "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Kishen Maloor <kishen.maloor@...el.com>,
        "Desouza, Ederson" <ederson.desouza@...el.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>
Cc:     brouer@...hat.com,
        "xdp-hints@...-project.net" <xdp-hints@...-project.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: AF_XDP finding descriptor room for XDP-hints metadata size


In previous discussions with AF_XDP maintainers (Magnus+Bjørn), I 
understood we have two challenges with metadata and BTF id.

  (1) AF_XDP doesn't know size of metadata area.
  (2) No room in xdp_desc to store the BTF-id.

Below I propose new idea to solve (1) metadata size.

To follow the discussion this is struct xdp_desc:

  /* Rx/Tx descriptor */
  struct xdp_desc {
	__u64 addr;
	__u32 len;
	__u32 options;
  };

One option (that was rejected) was to store the BTF-id in 'options' and
deduct the metadata size from BTF-id, but it was rejected as it blocks
future usages of 'options'.

The proposal by Magnus was to use a single bit in 'options' to say this
descriptor contains metadata described via BTF info. And Bjørn proposed
to store the BTF-id as the last member in metadata, as it would be
accessible via minus-4 byte offset from packet start 'addr'. And again
via BTF-id code can know the size of metadata area.

My idea is that we could store the metadata size in top-bits of 'len'
member when we have set the 'options' bit for BTF-metadata.

-Jesper

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ