[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210818120150.892647-8-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:01:37 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Marek Behun <kabel@...ckhole.sk>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 07/20] net: switchdev: don't assume RCU context in switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device
Now that the SWITCHDEV_FDB_{ADD,DEL}_TO_DEVICE events are blocking, it
would be nice if callers of the fan-out helper functions (i.e. DSA)
could benefit from that blocking context.
But at the moment, switchdev_handle_fdb_{add,del}_to_device use some
netdev adjacency list checking functions that assume RCU protection.
Switch over to their rtnl_mutex equivalents, since we are also running
with that taken, and drop the surrounding rcu_read_lock from the callers.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
net/dsa/slave.c | 4 ----
net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 249303ac3c3c..b6a94861cddd 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -2484,22 +2484,18 @@ static int dsa_slave_switchdev_blocking_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
dsa_slave_port_attr_set);
return notifier_from_errno(err);
case SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE:
- rcu_read_lock();
err = switchdev_handle_fdb_add_to_device(dev, ptr,
dsa_slave_dev_check,
dsa_foreign_dev_check,
dsa_slave_fdb_add_to_device,
NULL);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return notifier_from_errno(err);
case SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE:
- rcu_read_lock();
err = switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device(dev, ptr,
dsa_slave_dev_check,
dsa_foreign_dev_check,
dsa_slave_fdb_del_to_device,
NULL);
- rcu_read_unlock();
return notifier_from_errno(err);
}
diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index d09e8e9df5b6..fdbb73439f37 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ switchdev_lower_dev_find(struct net_device *dev,
.data = &switchdev_priv,
};
- netdev_walk_all_lower_dev_rcu(dev, switchdev_lower_dev_walk, &priv);
+ netdev_walk_all_lower_dev(dev, switchdev_lower_dev_walk, &priv);
return switchdev_priv.lower_dev;
}
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int __switchdev_handle_fdb_add_to_device(struct net_device *dev,
/* Event is neither on a bridge nor a LAG. Check whether it is on an
* interface that is in a bridge with us.
*/
- br = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(dev);
+ br = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
if (!br || !netif_is_bridge_master(br))
return 0;
@@ -569,6 +569,8 @@ int switchdev_handle_fdb_add_to_device(struct net_device *dev,
{
int err;
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
err = __switchdev_handle_fdb_add_to_device(dev, dev, fdb_info,
check_cb,
foreign_dev_check_cb,
@@ -648,7 +650,7 @@ static int __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device(struct net_device *dev,
/* Event is neither on a bridge nor a LAG. Check whether it is on an
* interface that is in a bridge with us.
*/
- br = netdev_master_upper_dev_get_rcu(dev);
+ br = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
if (!br || !netif_is_bridge_master(br))
return 0;
@@ -674,6 +676,8 @@ int switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device(struct net_device *dev,
{
int err;
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
err = __switchdev_handle_fdb_del_to_device(dev, dev, fdb_info,
check_cb,
foreign_dev_check_cb,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists