[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YR0hQ6UmtmGNg2AW@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 17:03:31 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: Support set_loopback override
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Gerhard Engleder wrote:
> phy_read_status and various other PHY functions support PHY specific
> overriding of driver functions by using a PHY specific pointer to the
> PHY driver. Add support of PHY specific override to phy_loopback too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 107aa6d7bc6b..ba5ad86ec826 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1821,11 +1821,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_resume);
>
> int phy_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable)
> {
> - struct phy_driver *phydrv = to_phy_driver(phydev->mdio.dev.driver);
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!phydrv)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (!phydev->drv)
> + return -EIO;
Humm, we need to take a closer look at what uses to_phy_driver() and
what uses phydev->drv. Do they need to be different? Can we make it
uniform?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists