[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5812918827b58dd353fd32b7042f1dfc2634e62.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:12:32 +0000
From: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: "Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: "toke@...hat.com" <toke@...hat.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Lobakin, Alexandr" <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
"bjorn@...nel.org" <bjorn@...nel.org>,
"joamaki@...il.com" <joamaki@...il.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"Creeley, Brett" <brett.creeley@...el.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 intel-next 0/9] XDP_TX improvements for ice
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 16:03 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:52:56AM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:59:01PM +0100, Nguyen, Anthony L wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-08-14 at 16:08 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> > > > With the v5, I think it's time for a proper change log.
> > >
> > > This isn't applying to the Intel-wired-LAN tree. If you want it
> > > to go
> > > through there, could you base the patches on that tree?
> >
> > Interestingly this is the first time that happens to me and I
> > always based
> > my XDP related driver work on bpf-next.
> >
> > iwl tree is some standalone tree or is it just the net-next ?
>
> Turns out that you have the switchdev set in your branch and it's not
> on
> net-next yet. I have adjusted my set on top of that code and sent a
> v6.
It's net-next but it also contains the Intel driver patches that are
making their way to net-next. Most of the time they'll apply to either
without issue, however, it depends on those extra patches. In this case
sounds like the switchdev set didn't allow for a clean apply. Thanks
for the v6.
> > > Also, looking at NIPA, it looks like patches 2 and 3 have kdoc
> > > issues.
> >
> > Yeah I saw kdoc issue on patch 3 and wanted to ask you to fix this
> > if you
> > would be applying that set but given that you're asking for a re-
> > submit
> > i'll fix those by myself.
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Tony
> > >
> > > > v4->v5:
> > > > * fix issues pointed by lkp; variables used for updating ring
> > > > stats
> > > > could be un-inited
> > > > * s/ice_ring/ice_rx_ring; it looks now symmetric given that we
> > > > have
> > > > ice_tx_ring struct dedicated for Tx ring
> > > > * go through the code and use ice_for_each_* macros; it was
> > > > spotted
> > > > by
> > > > Brett that there was a place around that code that this set
> > > > is
> > > > touching that was not using the ice_for_each_txq. Turned out
> > > > that
> > > > there
> > > > were more such places
> > > > * take care of coalesce related code; carry the info about type
> > > > of
> > > > ring
> > > > container in ice_ring_container
> > > > * pull out getting rid of @ring_active onto separate patch, as
> > > > suggested
> > > > by Brett
> > > >
> > > > v3->v4:
> > > > * fix lkp issues;
> > > >
> > > > v2->v3:
> > > > * improve XDP_TX in a proper way
> > > > * split ice_ring
> > > > * propagate XDP ring pointer to Rx ring
> > > >
> > > > v1->v2:
> > > > * try to improve XDP_TX processing
> > > >
> > > > v4 :
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210806095539.34423-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
> > > > v3 :
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210805230046.28715-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
> > > > v2 :
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210705164338.58313-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
> > > > v1 :
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210601113236.42651-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com/
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Maciej
> > > >
> > > > Maciej Fijalkowski (9):
> > > > ice: remove ring_active from ice_ring
> > > > ice: move ice_container_type onto ice_ring_container
> > > > ice: split ice_ring onto Tx/Rx separate structs
> > > > ice: unify xdp_rings accesses
> > > > ice: do not create xdp_frame on XDP_TX
> > > > ice: propagate xdp_ring onto rx_ring
> > > > ice: optimize XDP_TX workloads
> > > > ice: introduce XDP_TX fallback path
> > > > ice: make use of ice_for_each_* macros
> > > >
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice.h | 41 +++-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_arfs.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.c | 51 ++---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_base.h | 8 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dcb_lib.c | 9 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_dcb_lib.h | 10 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c | 93 +++++----
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 88 +++++----
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.h | 6 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 142 +++++++++-
> > > > ----
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp.h | 4 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_trace.h | 28 +--
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 183
> > > > +++++++++++-----
> > > > --
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h | 126 +++++++---
> > > > --
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c | 98 ++++++++--
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.h | 14 +-
> > > > .../net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_virtchnl_pf.c | 2 +-
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c | 70 ++++---
> > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.h | 20 +-
> > > > 20 files changed, 607 insertions(+), 390 deletions(-)
> > > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists