netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: mdio-mux: Delete unnecessary devm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YR1VhqiwIe85GpHE@lunn.ch>
Date:   Wed, 18 Aug 2021 20:46:30 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: mdio-mux: Delete unnecessary devm_kfree

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 07:56:42PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:10 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:08:39AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > The whole point of devm_* APIs is that you don't have to undo them if you
> > > are returning an error that's going to get propagated out of a probe()
> > > function. So delete unnecessary devm_kfree() call in the error return path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
> > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
> >
> > Please add a Fixes: tag, since you want this in stable.
> >
> > All three patches need fixes tags, possibly different for each patch?
> 
> I generally ask for patches to be picked up by stable only if it fixes
> a bug that puts the kernel in a bad state

Actually, you asked for stable. You set the subject to

[PATCH net v3 0/3] Clean up and fix error

where [PATCH net ] means stable. If you think this is just ongoing
development work, use [PATCH net-next ]. Then the Fixes tags are
optional.

	Andrew