[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YR5435p8EE5ORQXT@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 17:29:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, sergei.shtylyov@...il.com,
geert+renesas@...der.be, s.shtylyov@...russia.ru,
aford173@...il.com, ashiduka@...itsu.com,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com, yangyingliang@...wei.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com, biju.das@...renesas.com,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support
> Are we in such a haste? I was just going to review these patches
> today...
I guess the thinking is, fixup patches can always be applied after the
fact. But i agree, i really liked the 3 day wait time for patches to
be merged, it gave a reasonable amount of time for reviews, without
slowing down development work. The current 1 day or less does seem
counter productive, i expect there are less reviews happening as a
result, lower quality code, more bugs...
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists