[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e933f7e3-5573-bb8a-c313-75884d59235c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 17:32:19 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"sstabellini@...nel.org" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
"pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>,
"martin.b.radev@...il.com" <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"saravanand@...com" <saravanand@...com>,
"krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com" <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
"aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 11/13] HV/IOMMU: Enable swiotlb bounce buffer for
Isolation VM
On 8/20/2021 2:11 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
>> }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * hv_map_memory - map memory to extra space in the AMD SEV-SNP Isolation VM.
>> + */
>> +void *hv_map_memory(void *addr, unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long *pfns = kcalloc(size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE,
>> + sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + void *vaddr;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (!pfns)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE; i++)
>> + pfns[i] = virt_to_hvpfn(addr + i * HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE) +
>> + (ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary >> HV_HYP_PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +
>> + vaddr = vmap_pfn(pfns, size / HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_KERNEL_IO);
>> + kfree(pfns);
>> +
>> + return vaddr;
>> +}
> This function is manipulating page tables in the guest VM. It is not involved
> in communicating with Hyper-V, or passing PFNs to Hyper-V. The pfn array
> contains guest PFNs, not Hyper-V PFNs. So it should use PAGE_SIZE
> instead of HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, and similarly PAGE_SHIFT and virt_to_pfn().
> If this code were ever to run on ARM64 in the future with PAGE_SIZE other
> than 4 Kbytes, the use of PAGE_SIZE is correct choice.
OK. Will update with PAGE_SIZE.
>
>> +void __init hyperv_iommu_swiotlb_init(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long bytes;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Allocate Hyper-V swiotlb bounce buffer at early place
>> + * to reserve large contiguous memory.
>> + */
>> + hyperv_io_tlb_size = 256 * 1024 * 1024;
> A hard coded size here seems problematic. The memory size of
> Isolated VMs can vary by orders of magnitude. I see that
> xen_swiotlb_init() uses swiotlb_size_or_default(), which at least
> pays attention to the value specified on the kernel boot line.
>
> Another example is sev_setup_arch(), which in the native case sets
> the size to 6% of main memory, with a max of 1 Gbyte. This is
> the case that's closer to Isolated VMs, so doing something
> similar could be a good approach.
>
Yes, agree. It's better to keep bounce buffer size with AMD SEV.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists