[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YSLazK4TbG5wjHbu@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 01:16:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>
Cc: Alvin Šipraga <alvin@...s.dk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Michael Rasmussen <MIR@...g-olufsen.dk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: realtek-smi: fix mdio_free
bug on module unload
> No, there isn't. I neglected to mention in the rtl8365mb patch that I
> reworked the IRQ setup (compared with rtl8366rb) so that it could be
> torn down in a neat way. So you will see that the new driver does it
> properly, but I did not touch rtl8366rb because I am not using it. I am
> happy to do the same to rtl8366rb but I don't think I should make it
> part of this series. What do you think?
Lets see if Linus has time. He can probably model the change based on
what you have done here.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists