[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210823061938.28240-1-l4stpr0gr4m@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 15:19:38 +0900
From: Kangmin Park <l4stpr0gr4m@...il.com>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: replace __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag with skb_vlan_push
br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel() is called in br_handle_frame() and
goto drop when br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel() return non-zero.
But, br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel() always return 0. So, the goto
routine is currently meaningless.
However, paired function br_handle_egress_vlan_tunnel() call
skb_vlan_pop(). So, change br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel() to call
skb_vlan_push() instead of __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(). And return
the return value of skb_vlan_push().
Signed-off-by: Kangmin Park <l4stpr0gr4m@...il.com>
---
net/bridge/br_vlan_tunnel.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan_tunnel.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan_tunnel.c
index 01017448ebde..7b5a33dc9d4d 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_vlan_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan_tunnel.c
@@ -179,9 +179,7 @@ int br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb,
skb_dst_drop(skb);
- __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, p->br->vlan_proto, vlan->vid);
-
- return 0;
+ return skb_vlan_push(skb, p->br->vlan_proto, vlan->vid);
}
int br_handle_egress_vlan_tunnel(struct sk_buff *skb,
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists