netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210823.112049.2183912961708089551.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:20:49 +0100 (BST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc:     sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 08:34:53 +0200

> On 23.08.2021 04:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>> 
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c: In function 'bnx2_read_vpd_fw_ver':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c:8055:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword'; did you mean 'pci_vpd_find_info_keyword'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>  8055 |  j = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(data, BNX2_VPD_LEN,
>>       |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>       |      pci_vpd_find_info_keyword
>> 
>> Caused by commit
>> 
>>   ddc122aac91f ("bnx2: Search VPD with pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword()")
>> 
>> I have used the net-next tree from next-20210820 for today.
>> 
> This series was supposed to go through the PCI tree. It builds on recent patches
> that are in the PCI tree, but not in linux-next yet.
> I mentioned this dependency in the cover letter for the last series, but forgot
> it this time. Sorry.

I reverted it all, please don't forget the cover letter like this.

Thanks.