[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210824170239.GA3477243@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:02:39 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Sudarsana Kalluru <skalluru@...vell.com>,
GR-everest-linux-l2@...vell.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] bnx2x: Search VPD with
pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword()
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 03:54:23PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Use pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword() to search for keywords in VPD to
> simplify the code.
>
> str_id_reg and str_id_cap hold the same string and are used in the same
> comparison. This doesn't make sense, use one string str_id instead.
str_id_reg is printed with "%04x" (lower-case hex letters) and
str_id_cap with "%04X" (upper-case hex letters), so the previous code
would match either 0xabcd or 0xABCD. After this patch, we'd match
only the latter.
PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL is 0x1028, so it shouldn't make any difference,
which makes me wonder why somebody bothered with both.
But it does seem like a potential landmine to change the case
sensitivity. Maybe strncasecmp() instead?
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 57 +++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> index 0466adf8d..2c7bfc416 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> @@ -12189,11 +12189,10 @@ static int bnx2x_get_hwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp)
>
> static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp)
> {
> - int i, block_end, rodi;
> - char str_id_reg[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1];
> - char str_id_cap[VENDOR_ID_LEN+1];
> - unsigned int vpd_len;
> - u8 *vpd_data, len;
> + char str_id[VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1];
> + unsigned int vpd_len, kw_len;
> + u8 *vpd_data;
> + int rodi;
>
> memset(bp->fw_ver, 0, sizeof(bp->fw_ver));
>
> @@ -12201,46 +12200,20 @@ static void bnx2x_read_fwinfo(struct bnx2x *bp)
> if (IS_ERR(vpd_data))
> return;
>
> - /* VPD RO tag should be first tag after identifier string, hence
> - * we should be able to find it in first BNX2X_VPD_LEN chars
> - */
> - i = pci_vpd_find_tag(vpd_data, vpd_len, PCI_VPD_LRDT_RO_DATA);
> - if (i < 0)
> - goto out_not_found;
> -
> - block_end = i + PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE +
> - pci_vpd_lrdt_size(&vpd_data[i]);
> - i += PCI_VPD_LRDT_TAG_SIZE;
> -
> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end,
> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID);
> - if (rodi < 0)
> - goto out_not_found;
> -
> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]);
> -
> - if (len != VENDOR_ID_LEN)
> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len,
> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_MFR_ID, &kw_len);
> + if (rodi < 0 || kw_len != VENDOR_ID_LEN)
> goto out_not_found;
>
> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE;
> -
> /* vendor specific info */
> - snprintf(str_id_reg, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04x", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL);
> - snprintf(str_id_cap, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL);
> - if (!strncmp(str_id_reg, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN) ||
> - !strncmp(str_id_cap, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) {
> -
> - rodi = pci_vpd_find_info_keyword(vpd_data, i, block_end,
> - PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0);
> - if (rodi >= 0) {
> - len = pci_vpd_info_field_size(&vpd_data[rodi]);
> -
> - rodi += PCI_VPD_INFO_FLD_HDR_SIZE;
> -
> - if (len < 32 && (len + rodi) <= vpd_len) {
> - memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], len);
> - bp->fw_ver[len] = ' ';
> - }
> + snprintf(str_id, VENDOR_ID_LEN + 1, "%04X", PCI_VENDOR_ID_DELL);
> + if (!strncmp(str_id, &vpd_data[rodi], VENDOR_ID_LEN)) {
> + rodi = pci_vpd_find_ro_info_keyword(vpd_data, vpd_len,
> + PCI_VPD_RO_KEYWORD_VENDOR0,
> + &kw_len);
> + if (rodi >= 0 && kw_len < sizeof(bp->fw_ver)) {
> + memcpy(bp->fw_ver, &vpd_data[rodi], kw_len);
> + bp->fw_ver[kw_len] = ' ';
> }
> }
> out_not_found:
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists