| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4fe6edb4-a364-0e59-f902-9a362dd998d4@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:50:48 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel@...nvz.org,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH NET-NEXT] ipv6: skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize
incorrectly
On 8/24/21 1:23 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 8/23/21 2:51 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On 8/23/21 2:45 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On 8/23/21 10:25 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 12:56 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize
>>>>> after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit.
>>>>> This happen because skb_set_owner_w() for newly clone skb is called
>>>>> too early, before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for
>>>>> (!skb-sk) case.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...il.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> net/core/skbuff.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> index f931176..508d5c4 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>>>> @@ -1803,6 +1803,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_realloc_headroom(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>>>>>
>>>>> struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>>>>> {
>>>>> + struct sk_buff *oskb = skb;
>>>>> + struct sk_buff *nskb = NULL;
>>>>> int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0,
>>>>> @@ -1811,21 +1813,21 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>>>>>
>>>>> /* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */
>>>>> if (skb_shared(skb)) {
>>>>> - struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - if (likely(nskb)) {
>>>>> - if (skb->sk)
>>>>> - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk);
>>>>> - consume_skb(skb);
>>>>> - } else {
>>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>>> skb = nskb;
>>>>> }
>>>>> if (skb &&
>>>>> - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>>>>> - kfree_skb(skb);
>>>>> + pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC))
>>>>> skb = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (!skb) {
>>>>> + kfree_skb(oskb);
>>>>> + if (nskb)
>>>>> + kfree_skb(nskb);
>>>>> + } else if (nskb) {
>>>>> + if (oskb->sk)
>>>>> + skb_set_owner_w(nskb, oskb->sk);
>>>>> + consume_skb(oskb);
>>>>
>>>> sorry, this does not fix the problem. The syzkaller repro still
>>>> triggers the WARN.
>>>>
>>>> When it happens, the skb in ip6_xmit() is not shared as it comes from
>>>> __tcp_transmit_skb, where it is skb_clone()'d.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Old code (in skb_realloc_headroom())
>>> was first calling skb2 = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> At this point, skb2->sk was NULL
>>> So pskb_expand_head(skb2, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, ...) was able to tweak skb2->truesize
>>>
>>> I would try :
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> index f9311762cc475bd38d87c33e988d7c983b902e56..326749a8938637b044a616cc33b6a19ed191ac41 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
>>> @@ -1804,6 +1804,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_realloc_headroom);
>>> struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>>> {
>>> int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb);
>>> + struct sk_buff *oskb = NULL;
>>>
>>> if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0,
>>> "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__))
>>> @@ -1813,19 +1814,21 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>>> if (skb_shared(skb)) {
>>> struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>
>>> - if (likely(nskb)) {
>>> - if (skb->sk)
>>> - skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk);
>>> - consume_skb(skb);
>>> - } else {
>>> + if (unlikely(!nskb)) {
>>> kfree_skb(skb);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> }
>>> + oskb = skb;
>>> skb = nskb;
>>> }
>>> - if (skb &&
>>> - pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>>> + if (pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>>> kfree_skb(skb);
>>> - skb = NULL;
>>> + kfree_skb(oskb);
>>> + return NULL;
>>> + }
>>> + if (oskb) {
>>> + skb_set_owner_w(skb, oskb->sk);
>>> + consume_skb(oskb);
>>> }
>>> return skb;
>>> }
>>
>>
>> Oh well, probably not going to work.
>>
>> We have to find a way to properly increase skb->truesize, even if skb_clone() is _not_ called.
Can we adjust truesize outside pskb_expand_head()?
Could you please explain why it can be not safe?
> I also note that current use of skb_set_owner_w(), forcing skb->destructor to sock_wfree()
> is probably breaking TCP Small queues, since original skb->destructor would be tcp_wfree() or __sock_wfree()
I agree, however as far as I understand it is separate and more global problem.
Thank you,
Vasily Averin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists