[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAC_iWj+UefbRUdd9m_Mb6G=KvEV0TpTH9SAN1PSYAvQObL6ZRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:12:17 +0300
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] page_pool: use relaxed atomic for release
side accounting
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 12:07, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> There is no need to synchronize the account updating, so
> use the relaxed atomic to avoid some memory barrier in the
> data path.
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
> ---
> V3: Drop patch 2.
> V2: Remove unnecessary unliky() mark as pointed out by
> Heiner.
> ---
> net/core/page_pool.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index e140905..1a69784 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ void page_pool_release_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
> /* This may be the last page returned, releasing the pool, so
> * it is not safe to reference pool afterwards.
> */
> - count = atomic_inc_return(&pool->pages_state_release_cnt);
> + count = atomic_inc_return_relaxed(&pool->pages_state_release_cnt);
> trace_page_pool_state_release(pool, page, count);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_release_page);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists