[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <610f2842-8f39-6da9-07a3-2132f64f33e6@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:41:31 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
syzbot <syzbot+3f91de0b813cc3d19a80@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] KASAN: use-after-free Read in netlbl_catmap_walk
On 8/25/2021 11:31 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:21 PM syzbot
> <syzbot+3f91de0b813cc3d19a80@...kaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot found the following issue on:
>>
>> HEAD commit: 6e764bcd1cf7 Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org..
>> git tree: upstream
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=124e77c5300000
>> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=2fd902af77ff1e56
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3f91de0b813cc3d19a80
>> compiler: Debian clang version 11.0.1-2, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
>> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=13f72f16300000
>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=133e338d300000
>>
>> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
>> Reported-by: syzbot+3f91de0b813cc3d19a80@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>
>> ==================================================================
>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in _netlbl_catmap_getnode net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:564 [inline]
>> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in netlbl_catmap_walk+0x28b/0x2e0 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:615
>> Read of size 4 at addr ffff8880161c9800 by task syz-executor742/8768
>>
>> CPU: 0 PID: 8768 Comm: syz-executor742 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc7-syzkaller #0
>> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
>> Call Trace:
>> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>> dump_stack_lvl+0x1ae/0x29f lib/dump_stack.c:105
>> print_address_description+0x66/0x3b0 mm/kasan/report.c:233
>> __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline]
>> kasan_report+0x163/0x210 mm/kasan/report.c:436
>> _netlbl_catmap_getnode net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:564 [inline]
>> netlbl_catmap_walk+0x28b/0x2e0 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:615
>> cipso_seq_show+0x15f/0x280 security/smack/smackfs.c:789
>> traverse+0x1dc/0x530 fs/seq_file.c:111
>> seq_lseek+0x12b/0x240 fs/seq_file.c:323
>> vfs_llseek fs/read_write.c:300 [inline]
>> ksys_lseek fs/read_write.c:313 [inline]
>> __do_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:324 [inline]
>> __se_sys_lseek fs/read_write.c:322 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_lseek+0x15b/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:322
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>> RIP: 0033:0x445889
>> Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 11 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
>> RSP: 002b:00007f9a9cff0318 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000008
>> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004ca408 RCX: 0000000000445889
>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000100000001 RDI: 0000000000000003
>> RBP: 00000000004ca400 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
>> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000004ca40c
>> R13: 00007ffead4e31bf R14: 00007f9a9cff0400 R15: 0000000000022000
>>
>> Allocated by task 8768:
>> kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:38 [inline]
>> kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:46 [inline]
>> set_alloc_info mm/kasan/common.c:434 [inline]
>> ____kasan_kmalloc+0xcd/0x100 mm/kasan/common.c:513
>> kasan_kmalloc include/linux/kasan.h:264 [inline]
>> kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x96/0x340 mm/slub.c:2986
>> kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]
>> kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:721 [inline]
>> netlbl_catmap_alloc include/net/netlabel.h:317 [inline]
>> _netlbl_catmap_getnode net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:582 [inline]
>> netlbl_catmap_setbit+0x1cb/0x3f0 net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c:782
>> smk_netlbl_mls+0x103/0x5e0 security/smack/smack_access.c:505
>> smk_set_cipso+0x621/0x810 security/smack/smackfs.c:921
>> vfs_write+0x289/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:603
>> ksys_write+0x171/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:658
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>>
>> Freed by task 8769:
>> kasan_save_stack mm/kasan/common.c:38 [inline]
>> kasan_set_track+0x3d/0x70 mm/kasan/common.c:46
>> kasan_set_free_info+0x1f/0x40 mm/kasan/generic.c:360
>> ____kasan_slab_free+0x10d/0x150 mm/kasan/common.c:366
>> kasan_slab_free include/linux/kasan.h:230 [inline]
>> slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1628 [inline]
>> slab_free_freelist_hook+0x1e8/0x2a0 mm/slub.c:1653
>> slab_free mm/slub.c:3213 [inline]
>> kfree+0xcf/0x2e0 mm/slub.c:4267
>> netlbl_catmap_free include/net/netlabel.h:335 [inline]
>> smk_set_cipso+0x682/0x810 security/smack/smackfs.c:923
>> vfs_write+0x289/0xc90 fs/read_write.c:603
>> ksys_write+0x171/0x2a0 fs/read_write.c:658
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>>
>> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8880161c9800
>> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-64 of size 64
>> The buggy address is located 0 bytes inside of
>> 64-byte region [ffff8880161c9800, ffff8880161c9840)
>> The buggy address belongs to the page:
>> page:ffffea0000587240 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x161c9
>> flags: 0xfff00000000200(slab|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
>> raw: 00fff00000000200 0000000000000000 0000000b00000001 ffff888011041640
>> raw: 0000000000000000 0000000080200020 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
>> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>> page_owner tracks the page as allocated
>> page last allocated via order 0, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0x12cc0(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY), pid 6484, ts 27339779214, free_ts 27310944203
>> prep_new_page mm/page_alloc.c:2436 [inline]
>> get_page_from_freelist+0x779/0xa30 mm/page_alloc.c:4168
>> __alloc_pages+0x26c/0x5f0 mm/page_alloc.c:5390
>> alloc_slab_page mm/slub.c:1691 [inline]
>> allocate_slab+0xf1/0x540 mm/slub.c:1831
>> new_slab mm/slub.c:1894 [inline]
>> new_slab_objects mm/slub.c:2640 [inline]
>> ___slab_alloc+0x1cf/0x350 mm/slub.c:2803
>> __slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2843 [inline]
>> slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2925 [inline]
>> __kmalloc_node+0x310/0x430 mm/slub.c:4159
>> kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:614 [inline]
>> kvmalloc_node+0x81/0xf0 mm/util.c:587
>> kvmalloc include/linux/mm.h:806 [inline]
>> simple_xattr_alloc+0x3f/0xa0 fs/xattr.c:951
>> shmem_initxattrs+0x91/0x1e0 mm/shmem.c:3142
>> security_inode_init_security+0x37a/0x3c0 security/security.c:1099
>> shmem_mknod+0xb0/0x1b0 mm/shmem.c:2822
>> lookup_open fs/namei.c:3228 [inline]
>> open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3298 [inline]
>> path_openat+0x13b7/0x36b0 fs/namei.c:3504
>> do_filp_open+0x253/0x4d0 fs/namei.c:3534
>> do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1204
>> do_sys_open fs/open.c:1220 [inline]
>> __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1228 [inline]
>> __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1224 [inline]
>> __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1224
>> do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>> do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>> page last free stack trace:
>> reset_page_owner include/linux/page_owner.h:24 [inline]
>> free_pages_prepare mm/page_alloc.c:1346 [inline]
>> free_pcp_prepare+0xc29/0xd20 mm/page_alloc.c:1397
>> free_unref_page_prepare mm/page_alloc.c:3332 [inline]
>> free_unref_page+0x7e/0x550 mm/page_alloc.c:3411
>> __vunmap+0x926/0xa70 mm/vmalloc.c:2587
>> free_work+0x66/0x90 mm/vmalloc.c:82
>> process_one_work+0x833/0x10c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
>> worker_thread+0xac1/0x1320 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
>> kthread+0x453/0x480 kernel/kthread.c:319
>> ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
>>
>> Memory state around the buggy address:
>> ffff8880161c9700: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>> ffff8880161c9780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>>> ffff8880161c9800: fa fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>> ^
>> ffff8880161c9880: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>> ffff8880161c9900: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>> ==================================================================
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
>> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
>> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
>>
>> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
>> syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
>> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
> Adding Casey to the To/CC line as I think this issue lies with Smack
> and not NetLabel, although if someone believes otherwise please let me
> know.
This does appear to be a Smack issue. Smack issues should come to me.
> It looks like the problem is near the bottom of smk_set_cipso(), right
> after smk_netlbl_mls() successfully creates the netlabel category
> bitmap and attempts to free any old existing category bitmaps before
> assigning the new value. As I see it the problem is that the
> smack_known pointer, @skp, which is host to the bitmap is located from
> a RCU protected list meaning that it is possible for other tasks to be
> accessing the category bitmap while it is being freed, or directly
> afterwards given they may still be pointing at the old/freed data.
>
> Casey obviously knows Smack much better than I do so I'll refrain from
> going to far with a solution here in the likelihood that I'm off the
> mark, but I suspect the right solution here would be to either
> duplicate and replace the entry in the smack_known list using the
> normal RCU list manipulation approach (easiest?), manage the
> smack_known->smk_netlabel field as it's own RCU protected pointer
> (less easy?), or something else entirely (wildcard!). I'm not sure
> this is a problem we can, or want to, solve at the NetLabel layer.
Agreed. Not a problem for netlabel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists