[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ee51fc2-0b7e-4dc5-881b-9f6d671347ea@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 21:56:17 +0300
From: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@...le.com>,
Ivan Delalande <colona@...sta.com>,
Priyaranjan Jha <priyarjha@...gle.com>,
Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE"
<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 05/15] tcp: authopt: Add crypto initialization
On 8/25/21 8:55 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 9:35 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 25.08.2021 02:34, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On 8/24/21 2:34 PM, Leonard Crestez wrote:
>>>> The crypto_shash API is used in order to compute packet signatures. The
>>>> API comes with several unfortunate limitations:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Allocating a crypto_shash can sleep and must be done in user context.
>>>> 2) Packet signatures must be computed in softirq context
>>>> 3) Packet signatures use dynamic "traffic keys" which require exclusive
>>>> access to crypto_shash for crypto_setkey.
>>>>
>>>> The solution is to allocate one crypto_shash for each possible cpu for
>>>> each algorithm at setsockopt time. The per-cpu tfm is then borrowed from
>>>> softirq context, signatures are computed and the tfm is returned.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I could not see the per-cpu stuff that you mention in the changelog.
>>
>> That's a little embarrasing, I forgot to implement the actual per-cpu
>> stuff. tcp_authopt_alg_imp.tfm is meant to be an array up to NR_CPUS and
>> tcp_authopt_alg_get_tfm needs no locking other than preempt_disable
>> (which should already be the case).
>
> Well, do not use arrays of NR_CPUS and instead use normal per_cpu
> accessors (as in __tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool)
>
>>
>> The reference counting would still only happen from very few places:
>> setsockopt, close and openreq. This would only impact request/response
>> traffic and relatively little.
>
> What I meant is that __tcp_alloc_md5sig_pool() allocates stuff one time,
> we do not care about tcp_md5sig_pool_populated going back to false.
>
> Otherwise, a single user application constantly allocating a socket,
> enabling MD5 (or authopt), then closing the socket would incur
> a big cost on hosts with a lot of cpus.
Allocating only once would definitely simply things.
I don't know if this might end up tying hardware resources forever if
some accelerators are in play but for this feature software-only crypto
is perfectly fine.
--
Regards,
Leonard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists