[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3594d516-288c-d84e-83ec-91c5288b452c@blackwall.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:11:08 +0300
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...dia.com,
Joachim Wiberg <troglobit@...il.com>, dsahern@...il.com,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 01/17] ip: bridge: add support for
mcast_vlan_snooping
On 26/08/2021 18:08, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:05:17 +0300
> Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org> wrote:
>
>> + } else if (matches(*argv, "mcast_vlan_snooping") == 0) {
>> + __u32 mcvl_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_MCAST_VLAN_SNOOPING;
>
> Using matches() is problematic. since it will change how 'mcast' is
> handled.
>
> Overall, bridge command (and rest of iproute2) needs to move
> away from matches
>
Sure, I can send a follow up if you don't mind to switch all matches calls. I used it
to be in line with the current code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists