[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210826020111.l5v3dsr2onbz6zte@kashmir.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:01:11 -0700
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:50:50AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:717:47: error: expected ')' before 'struct'
> 717 | BTF_ID_LIST_GLOBAL_SINGLE(btf_task_struct_ids, struct, task_struct)
> | ^~~~~~~
> | )
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_tracing_func_proto':
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:1051:11: error: 'bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'bpf_get_current_task_proto'?
> 1051 | return &bpf_get_current_task_btf_proto;
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | bpf_get_current_task_proto
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 33c5cb36015a ("bpf: Consolidate task_struct BTF_ID declarations")
>
> I have used the bpf-next tree from next-20210825 for today.
Sorry about the breakage. I've put up
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/05d94748d9f4b3eecedc4fddd6875418a396e23c.1629942444.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz/T/#u
which I think should fix it. Can you give that patch a try?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists