netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 04/13] ravb: Add ptp_cfg_active to struct ravb_hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB5922A6AB6E7F2D802CD665C386C89@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Aug 2021 15:55:59 +0000
From:   Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 04/13] ravb: Add ptp_cfg_active to struct
 ravb_hw_info

Hi Sergei,

Thanks for the feedback.

> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/13] ravb: Add ptp_cfg_active to struct
> ravb_hw_info
> 
> On 27.08.2021 9:36, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >>>>>>>> Do you agree GAC register(gPTP active in Config) bit in
> >>>>>>>> AVB-DMAC
> >>>> mode register(CCC) present only in R-Car Gen3?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     Yes.
> >>>>>>>     But you feature naming is totally misguiding, nevertheless...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It can still be changed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      Thank goodness, yea!
> >>>>
> >>>> We have to live with the first version of this in the git history,
> >>>> but we can add more patches fixing up whatever is broken in the
> >>>> unreviewed code which got merged.
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Just suggest a new name.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      I'd prolly go with 'gptp' for the gPTP support and 'ccc_gac'
> >>>>> for the gPTP working also in CONFIG mode (CCC.GAC controls this
> feature).
> >>>>
> >>>> Biju, please could you work on a couple of patches to change the
> names.
> >>>
> >>> Yes. Will work on the patches to change the names as suggested.
> >>
> >>     TIA!
> >>     After some more thinking, 'no_gptp' seems to suit better for the
> >> 1st case Might need to invert the checks tho...
> >
> > OK, Will do with invert checks.
> >
> > So just to conclude,
> >
> > 'no_gptp' and 'ccc_gac' are the suggested names changes for the
> > previous patch and current patch.
> 
>      Your patches have been merged already. Might try to encompass all
> gPTP features with one patch (just a thought)...

OK, in that case it will be taken care in next RFC patch set.

Regards,
Biju