[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210827171715.GO7722@kadam>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:17:16 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: qrtr: make checks in qrtr_endpoint_post()
stricter
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:35:31PM +0800, butt3rflyh4ck wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:24 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > These checks are still not strict enough. The main problem is that if
> > "cb->type == QRTR_TYPE_NEW_SERVER" is true then "len - hdrlen" is
> > guaranteed to be 4 but we need to be at least 16 bytes. In fact, we
> > can reject everything smaller than sizeof(*pkt) which is 20 bytes.
> >
> > Also I don't like the ALIGN(size, 4). It's better to just insist that
> > data is needs to be aligned at the start.
> >
> > Fixes: 0baa99ee353c ("net: qrtr: Allow non-immediate node routing")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > This was from review. Not tested.
> >
> > net/qrtr/qrtr.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> > index b8508e35d20e..dbb647f5481b 100644
> > --- a/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> > +++ b/net/qrtr/qrtr.c
> > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int qrtr_endpoint_post(struct qrtr_endpoint *ep, const void *data, size_t len)
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
>
> > - if (!size || len != ALIGN(size, 4) + hdrlen)
> > + if (!size || size % 3 || len != size + hdrlen)
>
> Hi, (size % 3) is wrong, is it (size & 3), right ?
>
Yeah. Thanks for catching that. I means & 3.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists