[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210830200123.lsdkoa5rfmfj3xts@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:01:23 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next RFC v1 1/8] bpf: Introduce BPF support for
kernel module function calls
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 11:04:17PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> This change adds support on the kernel side to allow for BPF programs to
> call kernel module functions. Userspace will prepare an array of module
> BTF fds that is passed in during BPF_PROG_LOAD. In the kernel, the
> module BTF array is placed in the auxilliary struct for bpf_prog.
>
> The verifier then uses insn->off to index into this table. insn->off is
> used by subtracting one from it, as userspace has to set the index of
> array in insn->off incremented by 1. This lets us denote vmlinux btf by
> insn->off == 0, and the prog->aux->kfunc_btf_tab[insn->off - 1] for
> module BTFs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> include/linux/filter.h | 9 ++++
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +-
> kernel/bpf/core.c | 14 ++++++
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +-
> 7 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index f4c16f19f83e..39f59e5f3a26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -874,6 +874,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> void *jit_data; /* JIT specific data. arch dependent */
> struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke_tab;
> struct bpf_kfunc_desc_tab *kfunc_tab;
> + struct bpf_kfunc_btf_tab *kfunc_btf_tab;
> u32 size_poke_tab;
> struct bpf_ksym ksym;
> const struct bpf_prog_ops *ops;
> diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
> index 7d248941ecea..46451891633d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/filter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/filter.h
> @@ -592,6 +592,15 @@ struct bpf_prog {
> struct bpf_insn insnsi[];
> };
>
> +#define MAX_KFUNC_DESCS 256
> +/* There can only be at most MAX_KFUNC_DESCS module BTFs for kernel module
> + * function calls.
> + */
> +struct bpf_kfunc_btf_tab {
> + u32 nr_btfs;
> + struct btf_mod_pair btfs[];
> +};
> +
> struct sk_filter {
> refcount_t refcnt;
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 791f31dd0abe..4cbb2082a553 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1334,8 +1334,9 @@ union bpf_attr {
> /* or valid module BTF object fd or 0 to attach to vmlinux */
> __u32 attach_btf_obj_fd;
> };
> - __u32 :32; /* pad */
> + __u32 kfunc_btf_fds_cnt; /* reuse hole for count of BTF fds below */
No need for size.
> __aligned_u64 fd_array; /* array of FDs */
> + __aligned_u64 kfunc_btf_fds; /* array of BTF FDs for module kfunc support */
Just reuse fd_array. No need for another array of FDs.
> + tab = prog->aux->kfunc_btf_tab;
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + struct btf_mod_pair *p;
> + struct btf *mod_btf;
> +
> + mod_btf = btf_get_by_fd(fds[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(mod_btf)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(mod_btf);
> + goto free_prog;
> + }
> + if (!btf_is_module(mod_btf)) {
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + btf_put(mod_btf);
> + goto free_prog;
> + }
just do that dynamically like access to fd_array is handled in other places.
no need to preload.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists