[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaCukRbk=wBY=jobyCKDpQma-41gH34D=iigpj_AO6Hiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:45:54 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] libbpf: don't crash on object files with no symbol tables
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 9:58 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> If libbpf encounters an ELF file that has been stripped of its symbol
> table, it will crash in bpf_object__add_programs() when trying to
> dereference the obj->efile.symbols pointer. Add a check and return to avoid
> this.
>
> Fixes: 6245947c1b3c ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions")
> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 6f5e2757bb3c..4cd102affeef 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -668,6 +668,9 @@ bpf_object__add_programs(struct bpf_object *obj, Elf_Data *sec_data,
> const char *name;
> GElf_Sym sym;
>
> + if (!symbols)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
The more logical place to do this check is in
bpf_object__elf_collect(). Can you add this there? We can also include
helpful error message.
But I'm also curious which Clang version is being used to cause no ELF
symbols being generated?
> progs = obj->programs;
> nr_progs = obj->nr_programs;
> nr_syms = symbols->d_size / sizeof(GElf_Sym);
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists